Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:48

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
ChatGPT Is Making Us Weird - Business Insider
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Would people still care about Palestine if there was no Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is It Finally a Buyer’s Market in Housing? - A Wealth of Common Sense
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why does a lot of the YouTube community support the MGTOW movement?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Broadcom CEO On VMware Renewals, VCF Customers And Tomahawk 6 - CRN Magazine
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Report: Patriots have no plans to release Stefon Diggs - NBC Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.